grill-with-docs

To validate project plans, you cross-reference proposed architectural decisions against existing domain models and terminology to identify discrepancies. This ensures your proposed project planning aligns with the established domain knowledge before execution.

Keeping ADRs and CONTEXT.md updated is achieved by automatically modifying project documentation inline as architectural decisions crystallize. This maintains consistency in the project knowledge base while validating the project plan.

Domain terminology validation works by cross-examining your proposed architectural decisions with the project's existing domain model. It identifies gaps or discrepancies to ensure new project plans remain consistent with established terminology.

Yes, you can use project plan validation to maintain consistency in project documentation. It cross-references proposed decisions with the domain model and updates documentation like CONTEXT.md and ADRs as decisions are made.

You need architectural decision validation and documentation updates when considering new project plans or changes. This ensures proposed decisions are checked against the current domain model and that all related documentation remains consistent.

The limitations of automated documentation updates depend on the richness of the existing domain model and terminology. If the current project documentation lacks detail, the validation process may not identify all gaps in the proposed architectural decisions.