grill-with-docs

Architecture decision records (ADRs) capture critical architectural choices, their context, and consequences during project planning. Generating ADRs through structured interviews ensures every design decision is thoroughly questioned, documented, and aligned with team consensus before implementation begins.

You can generate a glossary and ADRs by running a structured grilling session that automatically extracts definitions and architectural decisions from interview content. This ensures project documentation evolves simultaneously with design refinement, keeping terms and choices synchronized.

Yes, interview-based refinement is ideal for complex product design documentation where clear communication and consensus are crucial. It conducts in-depth interviews to enhance plans, automatically producing comprehensive glossaries and ADRs tailored to collaborative project environments.

You need documentation tools and a structured interview process to start a grilling session. Running it alongside a domain-modeling skill initiates the refinement process, requiring no external dependencies but a collaborative environment for clear communication.

You should avoid interview-based refinement for design documentation when a project environment lacks collaborative stakeholders or clear communication channels. The process requires active participation to question assumptions and build consensus, making it unsuitable for isolated or purely static documentation tasks.