grill-with-docs

To validate project plans against existing domain models, you can use an interviewing process to resolve dependencies and enforce architectural constraints. This ensures your proposed changes remain consistent with established terminology and technical rigor.

Architectural documentation sync works by automatically updating project files like CONTEXT.md and ADRs in real-time. As you finalize design choices during a planning session, the documentation is updated to reflect the new architectural decisions.

The best way to prevent terminology confusion and architectural drift is to stress-test proposed plans against existing project glossaries and ADRs. This forces new features to align with the established domain language and architectural constraints.

Yes, you need access to repository documentation and the codebase to verify domain relationships. This access is required to effectively enforce architectural constraints and ensure technical rigor during the planning validation process.

Yes, you can check if proposed terminology matches an existing codebase by challenging your proposed changes against an established project glossary. This domain alignment process ensures your new feature plans use consistent project language.

You should not use automated architectural decision records validation if your project lacks existing domain models, ADRs, or established project language. The validation process requires pre-existing documentation to effectively challenge and align new plans.