grill-with-docs

Domain model review performs real-time analysis of your project codebase and documentation to ensure terminology consistency and alignment with the documented domain model. It corrects ambiguities and validates design decisions against existing CONTEXT.md files.

You update ADRs and CONTEXT.md inline during code review by proposing documentation updates as decisions are made. This maintains a living document reflecting the current domain model and terminology.

The best way to check feature proposals against existing domain definitions is to review proposed features interacting with customer data, ensuring the design aligns with existing project definitions and policies.

Yes, you need existing CONTEXT.md and ADRs to analyze domain model consistency. The process requires access to these existing documents and the ability to navigate the codebase to propose or update them.

You can use real-time documentation analysis without existing ADRs, as the process can propose and create new ADRs based on interactions. However, it works best when updating existing CONTEXT.md files for terminology consistency.

Domain terminology becomes inconsistent when design decisions are made without real-time review against the documented model. This creates ambiguities and misalignment between the codebase and existing documentation.