grill-with-docs

Validating development plans against domain models requires interviewing the user to resolve design ambiguities, challenging proposed changes against the project glossary and context map, and updating project documentation in real-time to maintain architectural consistency.

Preventing architectural drift involves stress-testing your development plans against existing domain models and ADRs, ensuring your approach respects architectural constraints and naming conventions before implementation begins.

Documentation sync works by automatically updating CONTEXT.md and ADRs as design decisions are finalized during a grilling session, ensuring project documentation reflects the resolved architectural constraints and domain terminology.

Yes, aligning development plans requires access to the repository's root context files and ADR directory to validate domain integrity, challenge proposed changes against the project glossary, and maintain consistent language across the codebase.

You should stress-test plans against context maps and glossaries when you are about to implement a new feature and want to ensure your approach respects existing architectural constraints, domain models, and naming conventions.

Yes, refactoring with domain consistency is possible by validating proposed changes against existing ADRs and domain models, resolving design ambiguities through structured interviewing, and updating documentation to reflect finalized architectural decisions.