grill-with-docs

You can stress-test decisions against existing CONTEXT.md and ADRs to surface ambiguities and misinterpretations. This domain alignment process clarifies mismatches between your planned architecture and the established project domain language, ensuring shared vocabulary across stakeholders.

Update CONTEXT.md and ADRs inline as design decisions crystallize during a question-driven session. This inline documentation approach ensures governance artifacts are promptly modified, capturing precise terminology changes while maintaining documentation governance workflows.

Surface terminology conflicts through a relentless, question-driven governance session that cross-references decisions against existing ADRs and CONTEXT.md. This domain alignment approach identifies domain language mismatches and generates actionable documentation artifacts resolving discrepancies.

Yes, you can use ADRs and CONTEXT.md for inline governance by guiding sessions that stress-test plans against existing documentation. This ensures disciplined debate, surfaces terminology conflicts, and generates precise documentation updates as architectural decisions are made.

Stress-test plans against existing architecture decisions when your team requires convergent domain language and inline governance. This is crucial when new design choices risk misinterpreting established terminology documented in your CONTEXT.md and ADRs.