grill-with-docs

To pressure-test a design plan, apply structured questioning to expose weak assumptions, unclear boundaries, and missing decisions early. This interrogation uncovers hidden tradeoffs and inconsistencies across product discovery and architecture reviews.

You create ADRs and a glossary incrementally by capturing decisions and shared terminology as the conversation progresses. This aligns with the domain-modeling workflow to maintain shared language and sharper team decisions.

The best way to challenge an architecture review is through structured questioning that surfaces tradeoffs and missing requirements. This keeps the planning workflow aligned by incrementally drafting supporting artifacts like ADRs and glossary entries.

Yes, you can use structured questioning to align team terminology during product discovery. It pairs well with domain modeling to establish shared language and expose unclear boundaries while drafting a glossary.

You should avoid a grilling session for design review when your plan lacks basic requirements or your team has not established initial domain modeling context. It requires existing ideas to interrogate for contradictions and missing decisions.