grill-with-docs

To document domain terms and decisions during planning, use an interrogation workflow to stress-test plans against a project domain model. This surfaces fuzzy terminology and captures decisions as ADRs while updating CONTEXT.md inline as terms crystallize.

Stress-testing a plan against a domain model involves running a structured interrogation workflow to elicit and record domain terms. This aligns stakeholders by exposing undocumented or fuzzy terminology and capturing architectural decisions as they emerge.

You need to create ADRs and update CONTEXT.md when domain terminology is fuzzy or undocumented. A structured interrogation workflow captures these decisions inline as they crystallize during the planning phase, maintaining documentation fidelity.

Maintaining a domain glossary when terminology is undocumented requires an interrogation workflow that elicits and records domain terms. As decisions crystallize during planning, glossary terms are updated inline within CONTEXT.md to ensure alignment.

Yes, you can capture architectural decisions while interrogating a project plan. The workflow records ADRs as decisions crystallize and simultaneously updates CONTEXT.md, ensuring domain context and terminology remain aligned throughout the process.

Domain terminology becomes fuzzy during software planning when terms remain undocumented or stakeholders use inconsistent language. An interrogation workflow surfaces these ambiguous terms, records them in a domain glossary, and aligns stakeholders through structured questioning.