grill-with-docs

Validating project plans against domain models requires an interactive interview process that challenges terminology, verifies domain relationships, and checks your proposed changes against existing documentation to prevent architectural drift and ensure technical consistency.

Domain-driven design validation is the process of stress-testing your architectural plans against established domain glossaries and context definitions to ensure proposed changes do not introduce terminology confusion or conflict with existing architectural decisions.

Determining if a feature requires an Architectural Decision Record (ADR) involves evaluating your design choices during planning to identify if the decision is significant enough to warrant formal documentation, ensuring system-wide architectural integrity is maintained.

Yes, adhering to established CONTEXT.md and ADR formatting standards is required to maintain system-wide architectural integrity and ensure the validation process can accurately cross-reference your proposed changes against existing domain documentation.

Preventing architectural drift is best achieved by stress-testing your plans against existing domain documentation and design decisions through an interactive interview that forces alignment with established architectural standards before implementation begins.