grill-with-docs

Validating project plans against domain terminology involves evaluating proposed plans for consistency with established language and documented decisions. You can assess alignment against your project's CONTEXT.md to identify terminology gaps before implementation.

Domain analysis in software planning ensures proposed project plans align with established domain language and documented decisions. It evaluates terminology consistency and checks that new plans respect existing CONTEXT.md definitions and architectural decision records.

You need to update CONTEXT.md during decision making when project plans evolve beyond established domain terminology or contradict documented decisions. Inline documentation updates keep your domain language synchronized as new decisions are made.

Design validation can check alignment with existing architectural decisions by evaluating user-proposed plans against documented ADRs and CONTEXT.md. This process identifies inconsistencies between new proposals and established project decisions.

Keeping ADRs updated as decisions evolve requires suggesting inline documentation updates as part of the planning process. Evaluating proposed plans against existing domain terminology triggers updates to both CONTEXT.md and ADRs when misalignment is detected.

The best way to ensure contextual planning respects domain language is evaluating proposed plans against established CONTEXT.md and documented decisions. This design validation approach surfaces terminology inconsistencies and suggests inline documentation updates during planning.