grill-with-docs

To validate a feature design against a domain model, you stress-test your project plans against existing domain terminology and ensure alignment with documented architecture decisions. This process refines terminology and clarifies project coherence through iterative feedback.

You update CONTEXT.md and ADRs during iterative development by challenging plans against domain knowledge, which triggers inline documentation updates as decisions are made. This ensures your architecture decision records reflect real-time plan coherence feedback.

Domain model validation and terminology clarification is the process of testing plan robustness against existing domain knowledge to standardize project language. It ensures new feature designs correctly apply documented terminology and align with existing architecture decisions.

Yes, domain model validation requires real-time feedback on plan coherence to effectively refine project plans against a defined domain model. This immediate feedback loop ensures continuous alignment with existing project documentation during iterative development.

The best way to standardize project terminology while updating documentation inline is to challenge your feature design against existing domain models. This approach refines terminology usage and automatically applies updates to your project documentation as decisions are made.

You should not use domain model validation for architecture decision records if your project lacks a defined domain model or existing documentation to challenge plans against. It requires established terminology and real-time feedback to update decisions accurately.