grill-with-docs

Review an architectural design by conducting an interactive, logic-based interrogation of project plans to identify gaps and structural weaknesses. This critical design review stress-tests early-stage ideas through rigorous questioning before committing to implementation.

Generate Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) by running an interactive design review session that simultaneously captures essential project artifacts. The session documents key decisions and creates glossaries while interrogating your evolving architecture.

To keep technical documentation in sync, use a design review session that generates ADRs and glossaries concurrently with the planning process. This ensures edge cases are considered and artifacts match the evolving design.

You need a critical design review during the initial phase of a new feature to ensure all edge cases are considered. It addresses the lack of stress-testing in early-stage planning by identifying logic and architecture gaps before implementation begins.

The design review leverages domain modeling techniques to ensure comprehensive coverage of technical requirements and project terminology. It interrogates your domain language to validate that architectural designs account for all necessary concepts.

You can use this logic-based interrogation on existing project plans to identify structural weaknesses and document findings. While best applied during the initial phase of a new feature, it also stress-tests and documents decisions for evolving designs.