grill-with-docs

Validating an engineering plan against your domain model involves iteratively interrogating design assumptions one question at a time, cross-checking the repository code, and flagging terminology conflicts with your established CONTEXT.md glossary.

Aligning design specifications with domain-driven design terminology requires challenging vague or overloaded terms against a living glossary, updating CONTEXT.md inline as definitions are resolved, and reconciling trade-offs across contexts.

You should create an Architecture Decision Record during a design review only when the interrogation process identifies a meaningful trade-off, sparingly documenting decisions rather than recording every minor plan adjustment.

To check if stated design intent contradicts the actual codebase implementation, perform repository-aware validation that inspects the code directly to detect contradictions and resolve dependencies between documented decisions.

Yes, you can resolve terminology conflicts across different bounded contexts by challenging assumptions one question at a time, ensuring decision dependencies and trade-offs are reconciled across all relevant artifacts and contexts.