growing

Automate growth-loop attribution and hypothesis confidence updates across growth signals.

Updated Feb 17, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/0xHoneyJar/construct-observer --skill growing
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: growing
Source: https://github.com/0xHoneyJar/construct-observer/tree/main/skills/growing
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/0xHoneyJar/construct-observer --skill growing

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Reviews and orchestrates the growth-loop lifecycle by validating proposed matches, updating hypothesis confidence, executing decay, and surfacing growth changes in a controlled, operator-verified pipeline.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Operator-confirmed review of proposed growth matches to ensure signal quality is correctly attributed.
  • Per-user isolation during classification to preserve context and avoid cross-user leakage.
  • End-to-end growth state management: update confidence, decay aging hypotheses, and surface actionable growth patterns for multi-user programs.
  • Cross-user pattern discovery to surface systemic growth signals and decay trends across the cohort.

Quick Start

Run the growth loop for all users with /grow or target a single user with /grow --user <user> and allow operator confirmations during the review steps.

Frequently Asked Questions about growing

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate growth-loop attribution for multi-user research programs?

You can orchestrate the full lifecycle by running /grow for all users or /grow --user <user> for a single target. The pipeline executes operator-confirmed reviews, updates hypothesis confidence, and applies decay to aging signals automatically.

What is hypothesis confidence decay and how does signal decay management work?

Hypothesis confidence decay reduces the influence of aging growth signals over time. The Skill applies atomic state updates to aging hypotheses, ensuring outdated signals lose influence while operator-verified matches maintain attribution accuracy.

Can I isolate classification context per user to avoid cross-user signal leakage?

Yes, per-user isolation during classification preserves individual context and prevents cross-user leakage. This ensures deterministic and manual review workflows maintain strict boundaries when attributing growth signals across multi-user programs.

How does operator-verified review improve growth signal attribution?

Operator-confirmed review validates proposed growth matches before applying state updates, ensuring signal quality is correctly attributed. This manual verification layer prevents false positives from contaminating hypothesis confidence and cross-user pattern detection.

Does this growth-loop orchestration tool support cross-user pattern detection?

Yes, cross-user pattern discovery surfaces systemic growth signals and decay trends across the cohort. It identifies shared growth changes while maintaining per-user isolation during the classification and operator-verified review cycles.

What are the limitations of manual review workflows in iterative hypothesis testing?

Manual review workflows require operator confirmation for proposed matches, which can create bottlenecks at scale. However, this constraint ensures signal quality attribution and prevents unvalidated hypotheses from affecting cross-user pattern detection and decay execution.