gsd-code-review

Identify and report bugs, security problems, and quality concerns in changed code for a given phase.

Updated Apr 22, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/hadpadrahul/school-erp --skill gsd-code-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: gsd-code-review
Source: https://github.com/hadpadrahul/school-erp/tree/main/.codex/skills/gsd-code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/hadpadrahul/school-erp --skill gsd-code-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Automatically reviewing phase-based code changes to surface bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code-quality issues before integration.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Spawn the gsd-code-reviewer agent to analyze changed files at a specified depth (quick, standard, or deep).
  • Support phase-scoped analysis with optional file filtering via --files; when used, further scope resolution is skipped.
  • Output a phase REVIEW.md artifact containing a severity-classified findings summary and actionable recommendations.
  • Enforce phase validation and gating to ensure reviews run against valid phase state.

Quick Start

Provide the phase number and optional depth and file filters to start a code review and generate the phase REVIEW.md.

Frequently Asked Questions about gsd-code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review for phase-based changes across repositories?

To automate phase-based code review, you provide a phase number and optional depth to analyze changed files for bugs, security, and quality issues. It generates a REVIEW.md artifact with a severity-classified findings summary and actionable recommendations.

What is the difference between quick, standard, and deep code review depth?

Code review depth options control the analysis intensity applied to changed files. Quick, standard, and deep depths allow you to scale the scrutiny of bugs and security vulnerabilities based on your phase requirements and available review time.

Can I filter code review scoping to specific files instead of the whole phase?

You can scope code reviews to specific files using the optional --files override. When provided, this filter targets only the specified files and skips further phase-based scope resolution across repositories.

How do I generate a markdown report for security and code quality findings?

Generating a markdown report for security and code quality findings is done by running a phase review. The process outputs a {phase}-REVIEW.md artifact containing an inline summary of severity-classified findings and actionable recommendations.

Does phase-based code review enforce validation before analyzing changes?

Phase-based code review enforces phase validation and gating to ensure reviews run against a valid phase state. This mechanism prevents analyzing code changes when the underlying phase state is invalid or incomplete.