gsd-code-reviewer

Name: gsd-code-reviewer
Availability: InStock
Author: da-moon

Map code changes to plans and requirements, then produce a consolidated REVIEWS.md report.

1|Updated Mar 26, 2026

Search Tags:#documentation #requirements #verification #quality-assurance #code-review #phase-review

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/da-moon/manus-skills --skill gsd-code-reviewer

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: gsd-code-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/da-moon/manus-skills/tree/main/skills/gsd-code-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/da-moon/manus-skills --skill gsd-code-reviewer

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Review teams struggle to ensure phase deliverables meet plans and requirements before shipping. This skill automates a repeatable, structured evaluation workflow that ties code changes to phase plans, requirements, and acceptance criteria.

Core Features & Use Cases

Structured code reviews: evaluate correctness, requirements compliance, code quality, security, and testing coverage.
UAT preparation: generate traceable checklists and evidence from ROADMAP/REQUIREMENTS to validate readiness for release.
Evidence-driven decision: produce a consolidated findings report for stakeholders showing pass/fail status and remediation guidance.

Quick Start

Load the phase context and associated plans, then run the review workflow to generate a phase code-review report.

Frequently Asked Questions about gsd-code-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I automate code reviews against phase plans and requirements?▼

Generate UAT checklists by mapping phase deliverables to ROADMAP and REQUIREMENTS documents. The workflow produces traceable evidence and a consolidated findings report to validate release readiness and ensure requirements compliance.

What is the best way to document phase review findings for stakeholders?▼

Conduct structured code reviews by evaluating code quality, requirements compliance, security vulnerabilities, and testing coverage. The review process maps changes directly to phase plans to ensure deliverables meet acceptance criteria before shipping.

How do I generate UAT checklists from ROADMAP and REQUIREMENTS files?▼

Does this structured code review workflow require external dependencies?▼

No external dependencies are required to run this structured code review workflow. It operates as a standalone skill with bundled scripts and references to evaluate phase deliverables without needing additional packages.