gsd-discuss-phase

Guide adaptive questioning to surface phase uncertainties before planning.

Updated Apr 22, 2026

Search Tags:#planning #risk-mitigation #gray-areas #context-gathering #adaptive-questioning #contextual-alignment

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/hadpadrahul/school-erp --skill gsd-discuss-phase-hadpadrahul

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: gsd-discuss-phase
Source: https://github.com/hadpadrahul/school-erp/tree/main/.codex/skills/gsd-discuss-phase
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/hadpadrahul/school-erp --skill gsd-discuss-phase-hadpadrahul

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Surface phase uncertainties by guiding adaptive questioning before planning.

Core Features & Use Cases

Adaptive questioning to surface gray areas and assumptions early in the project lifecycle.
Supports controlled discussion flow with modes (--all, --auto, --chain, --power).
Generates a concrete CONTEXT.md titled with the phase number to guide downstream research and planning.

Quick Start

Invoke gsd-discuss-phase with the phase number to begin adaptive questions and surface gray areas before planning.

Frequently Asked Questions about gsd-discuss-phase

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I surface phase uncertainties and gray areas before starting project planning?▼

Surface phase uncertainties before planning by using adaptive questioning to identify gray areas and assumptions early. This approach guides contextual alignment across stakeholders, artifacts, and decisions, enabling deliberate selection of discussion topics for research-driven initiatives.

What is the best way to align stakeholder context before downstream planning agents execute?▼

Align stakeholder context by gathering decisions through adaptive questioning and generating a phase-specific CONTEXT.md file. This output contains concrete decisions and loaded prior context, ensuring downstream agents receive the necessary contextual alignment for execution.

How do I use adaptive questioning modes to control discussion flow for risk mitigation?▼

Control discussion flow for risk mitigation by invoking optional modes like --all, --auto, --chain, and --power. These modes manage the adaptive questioning process, allowing you to tailor the depth and automation of context-gathering before planning.

Can I use this adaptive questioning approach for research-driven initiatives requiring artifact alignment?▼

Yes, adaptive questioning is designed for research-driven initiatives requiring contextual alignment across stakeholders and artifacts. It enforces controlled discussion flow to gather necessary context and outputs a phase-numbered CONTEXT.md file for downstream use.

When do I need to generate a phase-specific CONTEXT.md file for project planning?▼

Generate a phase-specific CONTEXT.md file when you need to document concrete decisions and loaded prior context before planning begins. It is required when downstream agents depend on contextual alignment and surfaced gray areas to execute research-driven initiatives accurately.