gsd-discuss-phase

To clarify implementation ambiguities, you can facilitate a structured discussion that identifies gray areas in your codebase and phase goals, guiding you through probing questions to reach concrete decisions.

The best way to capture project decisions is to consolidate agreed-upon implementation details into a CONTEXT.md file, ensuring downstream research and planning agents have clear direction.

You identify gray areas by analyzing the codebase and phase goals to pinpoint specific UI, UX, or behavioral areas needing discussion before development begins.

Yes, this approach works for finalizing UI elements, error handling messages, and data display formats by facilitating a deep-dive into selected areas through targeted questions.

You need a structured discussion for project management when you must resolve implementation ambiguities and make concrete decisions about a specific phase before action begins.

Yes, you can use this to document context for research and planning agents by writing finalized implementation decisions into a CONTEXT.md file during the discussion phase.