gsd-discuss-phase

To gather missing project context before planning, use adaptive questioning to surface gray areas and consolidate prior decisions from existing state files. This resolves evolving requirements and produces decision-ready context for downstream workflows.

Avoid re-asking settled questions during requirements analysis by consolidating existing project notes and earlier decisions. Context-file awareness ensures the workflow reuses established context and only prompts for missing information.

Resolve gray areas in a phase-based workflow by applying adaptive questioning tailored to the current project state. This interactive approach targets unresolved requirements and consolidates prior decisions to ensure planning readiness.

Yes, you can use existing project state files to prepare decision-ready context. The workflow pulls together prior decisions and notes, ensuring downstream research and planning workflows stay consistent without losing established context.

Yes, context gathering for project planning requires interactive user input handling. The workflow asks targeted follow-up questions based on the current phase to surface missing information and resolve ambiguities before planning begins.

You should avoid adaptive questioning for requirements analysis when project context is already complete and unambiguous. If all prior decisions are settled and no gray areas exist, skipping context gathering prevents unnecessary delays in planning.