gsd-eval-review

You need AI evaluation coverage auditing when a completed AI workflow phase may not have fully implemented your intended evaluation strategy, risking blind spots. A retrospective review identifies missing coverage and prevents repeated gaps.

Generate a remediation plan by auditing the executed AI phase against your intended evaluation strategy, which produces a review document containing a coverage score, a final verdict, identified gaps, and specific steps to fix the issues for the next run.

Yes, retrospective quality assurance review supports different task contexts and phase numbers across completed workflow phases. It targets the phase specified by the phase number argument, defaulting to the last completed phase if none is provided.

An evaluation coverage audit outputs a review file containing a score, a verdict, identified gaps, and a remediation plan. This documents whether your intended evaluation strategy from your specification was actually implemented.

The evaluation review requires reading an AI specification file containing your intended evaluation strategy to compare against the implemented evaluation behavior. It then writes a review file containing the score, verdict, gaps, and remediation plan.