gsd-eval-review

Audit executed AI evaluation coverage and generate an EVAL-REVIEW.md remediation plan.

1|Updated May 24, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/tinner-deinno/innova-skills-lib --skill gsd-eval-review-tinner-deinno
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: gsd-eval-review
Source: https://github.com/tinner-deinno/innova-skills-lib/tree/main/core/gsd/gsd-eval-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/tinner-deinno/innova-skills-lib --skill gsd-eval-review-tinner-deinno

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps teams verify whether an executed AI phase actually implemented its intended evaluation strategy, then converts any coverage gaps into a remediation plan.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Evaluation coverage audit: Checks that AI-SPEC.md evaluation strategy was implemented for the completed phase.
  • Retroactive scoring & verdict: Produces a clear EVAL-REVIEW.md outcome including score and pass/fail style verdict.
  • Actionable gap analysis: Identifies missing or weak evaluation elements and lays out concrete next steps to fix them.
  • Use Case: After shipping an AI phase that was supposed to include specific eval gates, use this Skill to confirm what was actually covered and generate a prioritized remediation checklist for the next run.

Quick Start

Run the skill and supply the completed phase number to generate EVAL-REVIEW.md.

Frequently Asked Questions about gsd-eval-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I audit AI evaluation coverage for a completed phase?

Auditing AI evaluation coverage involves reviewing a completed agent workflow against the declared AI-SPEC.md evaluation strategy to verify implemented gates. This process identifies missing or weak elements and generates a scored verdict with an EVAL-REVIEW.md remediation plan.

What is an AI-SPEC.md evaluation strategy and when do I need to review it?

An AI-SPEC.md evaluation strategy defines the intended quality gates for an AI delivery phase. You need to review it retroactively after phase completion to confirm the actual agent workflow matched the declared strategy and to document any coverage gaps.

How do I generate a remediation plan for missing AI evaluation gates?

Generating a remediation plan for missing evaluation gates requires running a retroactive audit on the finished phase. The audit produces a scored pass/fail verdict and outputs an EVAL-REVIEW.md file detailing explicit gaps and concrete next steps to fix them.

Can I use phase-based delivery reviews to check iterative agent workflows?

Phase-based delivery reviews are designed for iterative agent workflows, applying retroactive audits to completed phases. They preserve existing workflow gates while scoring evaluation coverage and producing actionable remediation plans for subsequent runs.

What limitations exist when auditing evaluation coverage retroactively?

Retroactive evaluation coverage audits are limited to reviewing completed phases against the declared AI-SPEC.md strategy. They cannot fix missing gates in past workflows, but they do produce a prioritized EVAL-REVIEW.md remediation checklist for future iterations.