gsd-list-phase-assumptions

Validate a roadmap phase number and surface planning assumptions.

Updated Feb 11, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ArtRiv/game-topicos-especiais --skill gsd-list-phase-assumptions-artriv
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: gsd-list-phase-assumptions
Source: https://github.com/ArtRiv/game-topicos-especiais/tree/main/.github/skills/gsd-list-phase-assumptions
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ArtRiv/game-topicos-especiais --skill gsd-list-phase-assumptions-artriv

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

It helps teams avoid building the wrong plan by surfacing the agent’s assumptions about how a phase should be approached before any detailed planning starts.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Assumption-first phase review: Analyzes a given phase and lists assumptions about the technical approach, implementation order, scope boundaries, risks, and dependencies.
  • Roadmap-based validation: Validates the provided phase number against the project’s roadmap to ensure the requested phase exists.
  • Feedback-driven next step: Ends by prompting the user with "What do you think?" to enable early course correction.

Quick Start

Ask for the phase assumptions by specifying the phase number as the argument, then review the surfaced assumptions and respond to the "What do you think?" prompt.

Frequently Asked Questions about gsd-list-phase-assumptions

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I surface phase assumptions before generating a project implementation plan?

To surface phase assumptions, you validate the phase number against your roadmap and generate a comprehensive assumption list covering technical approach, implementation order, scope boundaries, risks, and dependencies before any planning begins.

What is assumption-first phase planning and when do I need it?

Assumption-first phase planning is the process of listing an agent's assumptions about a phase's technical approach, scope, risks, and dependencies before planning starts. You need it to prevent building a misaligned roadmap execution plan.

How do I validate a phase number against an existing roadmap?

Validating a phase number requires checking the requested phase against the project's roadmap to ensure the phase exists, then mapping assumptions across the technical approach, implementation order, scope boundaries, risks, and dependencies.

Can I map technical approach and dependency assumptions for a specific roadmap phase?

Yes, you can map technical approach and dependency assumptions by providing the phase number as an argument, which triggers a roadmap existence check and outputs assumption coverage across implementation order, scope boundaries, and risk assessment.

What are the limitations of planning a phase without validating assumptions first?

Planning a phase without validating assumptions risks building the wrong plan due to misaligned technical approaches, incorrect implementation order, undefined scope boundaries, unmapped dependencies, and unidentified risks.

What's the best way to prevent misaligned planning during roadmap-driven execution?

The best way to prevent misaligned planning is to conduct an assumption-first phase review that validates the phase number, maps dependencies and risks, and prompts for user feedback with a 'What do you think?' question before generating any plan.