gsd-list-phase-assumptions

Surface phase-planning assumptions for technical approach, scope, risks, and dependencies.

Updated Aug 15, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/gesmith0606/nfl_data_engineering --skill gsd-list-phase-assumptions-gesmith0606
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: gsd-list-phase-assumptions
Source: https://github.com/gesmith0606/nfl_data_engineering/tree/main/.claude/skills/gsd-list-phase-assumptions
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/gesmith0606/nfl_data_engineering --skill gsd-list-phase-assumptions-gesmith0606

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Surface phase-planning assumptions before initiating project planning to prevent misalignment and rework.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Surface technical approach, implementation order, scope boundaries, risk areas, and dependencies for a given phase.
  • Validate phase against roadmap and surface structured assumptions across multiple dimensions.
  • Provide a ready-to-review output that prompts user feedback with a clear next step.

Quick Start

Request phase assumptions by providing the phase number to Claude to see technical approach, order, scope, risks, and dependencies.

Frequently Asked Questions about gsd-list-phase-assumptions

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I surface phase assumptions before starting project planning?

Phase planning requires validating the phase against the roadmap to surface structured assumptions for technical approach, implementation order, scope boundaries, risk areas, and dependencies. This prevents misalignment and rework before initiating project planning.

What is dependency mapping for project phase validation?

Dependency mapping for phase validation identifies and structures the dependencies and risk areas associated with a specific project phase. It produces a ready-to-review output that validates the phase against the overall roadmap before planning begins.

How do I identify scope boundaries and risk areas for a project phase?

To identify scope boundaries and risk areas for a project phase, validate the phase against the roadmap to generate structured assumptions. This covers technical approach, implementation order, and dependencies to prompt user feedback with a clear next step.

Can I validate a roadmap phase without detailed technical approach assumptions?

Validating a roadmap phase requires surfacing structured assumptions for the technical approach, implementation order, scope boundaries, risk areas, and dependencies. Providing the phase number produces a ready-to-review output that prompts user feedback.

What's the best way to prevent misalignment and rework during phase planning?

The best way to prevent misalignment and rework during phase planning is to surface structured assumptions across multiple dimensions before initiating the project. Validating the phase against the roadmap produces a structured output for review.