gsd-list-phase-assumptions

Analyze a project phase and surface assumptions about approach, order, scope, risks, and dependencies.

Updated Mar 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/onelee85/my-skills --skill gsd-list-phase-assumptions-onelee85
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: gsd-list-phase-assumptions
Source: https://github.com/onelee85/my-skills/tree/main/gsd-list-phase-assumptions
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/onelee85/my-skills --skill gsd-list-phase-assumptions-onelee85

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Surface Claude's assumptions about a phase approach before planning, helping teams align on strategy early.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Surface assumptions about technical approach, implementation order, scope boundaries, risks, and dependencies.
  • Provide transparent outputs to enable early course correction before planning begins.
  • Use case: In a new project, run this skill to surface and agree on critical phase assumptions with stakeholders.

Quick Start

Review the current phase description in the roadmap and run the skill with the phase number as input to reveal assumptions.

Frequently Asked Questions about gsd-list-phase-assumptions

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I reveal phase assumptions before starting project planning?

To reveal phase assumptions before planning, analyze the project phase to surface technical approach, implementation order, scope boundaries, risks, and dependencies for stakeholder alignment. This early course correction prevents roadmap misalignment.

What is the best way to validate a roadmap phase with stakeholders?

The best way to validate a roadmap phase with stakeholders is to enumerate assumptions across five key areas: technical approach, order, scope, risks, and dependencies. Providing transparent outputs enables early alignment and course correction before planning begins.

How do I surface technical risks and dependencies for sprint scoping?

You surface technical risks and dependencies for sprint scoping by analyzing the target phase against the project roadmap. The process enumerates hidden assumptions across technical approach and scope boundaries, concluding with a user prompt for feedback.

Can I use this to analyze project scope boundaries before committing to a plan?

Yes, you can analyze project scope boundaries before committing to a plan. The skill validates the current phase description against the roadmap and transparently outputs assumptions about scope, implementation order, and dependencies to enable early course correction.

Why do I need to analyze phase assumptions for roadmap validation?

You need to analyze phase assumptions for roadmap validation because surfacing hidden assumptions about technical approach and dependencies helps teams align on strategy early. This prevents costly misalignment and scope creep during actual planning and execution.