gsd-maritime-plan

The process involves a three-stage review: an architecture agent generates compliant technical architectures and evaluation criteria for ROS2 interfaces, a critic agent performs formal adversarial review to highlight risks, and a convergence stage synthesizes a final recommended architecture with traceable risk logging.

Multi-agent adversarial review in maritime GSD planning is a technique where an architecture agent proposes technical solutions and a critic agent formally challenges them. This ensures safety-critical assessment by identifying gaps, barrier thresholds, and non-conformances across STRAT/TACT modes before plan convergence.

To identify safety risks and barrier thresholds in ship system architecture, apply a formal adversarial review during the GSD plan phase. A dedicated critic agent evaluates the proposed architecture against physical and algorithmic constraints, logging traceable risks and documenting non-conformances across barrier integration.

Yes, this GSD plan review explicitly supports NSGA-III and FFRLS considerations. The critic agent evaluates proposed maritime architectures against these specific algorithmic constraints, ensuring the final synthesized plan adheres to required physical and algorithmic thresholds for safety-critical systems.

Yes, you can use this architecture review for maritime systems with multiple subsystems. It evaluates cross-module interactions, generates explicit interface contracts for ROS2 data flows, and documents implementation complexity to ensure all subsystems integrate safely and conform to barrier thresholds.