gsd-pr-branch

To remove planning-only commits from a pull request branch, you need to apply branch history rewriting or commit filtering that preserves implementation work while excluding planning files and metadata. This process filters out `.planning/` history to produce a clean PR branch focused on actual code changes.

Your code review diff shows planning artifacts because workflow files like PLAN, SUMMARY, or STATE records are cluttering the branch history. Filtering planning-only commits from the pull request branch keeps reviewers focused on implementation work rather than planning file churn.

Yes, you can clean up a Git branch to exclude `.planning/` files before a code review by applying commit filtering that preserves implementation work. This produces a review-ready PR branch that removes planning artifacts from the diff entirely.

The best way to turn a noisy development branch into a review-ready PR is to filter planning-only commits from the branch history. This process removes workflow artifacts like planning files and metadata, ensuring reviewers see only the actual implementation work in the pull request diff.

Yes, branch history rewriting preserves your actual code changes when filtering commits by specifically targeting planning-only commits for exclusion. This approach maintains all implementation work while removing `.planning/` history and related metadata from the branch.

You need to filter planning artifacts from your Git workflow when using a branching process where planning files clutter diffs and reviewers need to see only code changes. This is necessary for teams wanting planning artifacts excluded from code review diffs to maintain review clarity.