gsd:reference:checkpoints

Standardize checkpoint documentation by organizing progress, decisions, and risks into structured Markdown with frontmatter metadata. Use defined checkpoint types like wave, phase, milestone, and project to track governance and reporting consistently.

Checkpoint reports should include completed work, pending work, blockers and risks, and user decisions. Structuring these contents ensures project governance teams can effectively track progress and make informed decisions at each milestone.

Use different checkpoint types when tracking progress across varying scopes. Apply wave, phase, milestone, and project checkpoints to organize governance documentation, ensuring each level captures relevant decisions, risks, and completed work.

Write best practices for milestone documentation by defining clear success criteria and standardizing frontmatter metadata. Apply these practices to governance, reporting, and decision-making scenarios to maintain consistent progress tracking.

Yes, structured Markdown supports project governance decision tracking by combining frontmatter metadata with a readable body. This format standardizes checkpoint contents, enabling teams to review decisions, blockers, and risks effectively.