gsd-research-phase

You can research feasibility and architecture choices by orchestrating a dedicated phase researcher to evaluate implementation options. This process validates viability against the roadmap and produces a structured RESEARCH.md documenting recommended stacks, architecture patterns, and validation criteria for planning.

Phase research is the structured evaluation of implementation approaches, architecture patterns, and feasibility before planning a project stage. You need it to surface decision criteria, validate viability against the roadmap, and document technical context for stakeholders prior to committing to a specific stack.

Document architecture decisions and recommended tech stacks by generating a structured RESEARCH.md file. This file captures the evaluated implementation approaches, selected architecture patterns, recommended stack, and risk or validation notes to provide clear guidance for downstream planning tasks.

Yes, you can validate phase viability against a roadmap by conducting targeted phase research. This process examines the feasibility and implementation options for the specified phase, ensuring the proposed architecture choices align with overall project goals before development begins.

A feasibility study for software implementation approaches should include an assessment of technical viability, recommended architecture patterns, stack choices, and validation criteria. It must also document the decision context and surface risk notes to guide stakeholders through subsequent planning steps.

Yes, you need specific environment context to accurately evaluate implementation options for a phase. Providing the correct context allows the research process to assess feasibility, determine appropriate architecture patterns, and validate the phase viability against the project roadmap.