gsd-review

To get AI peer reviews for phase plans, you can route planning documents to multiple external AI CLIs like Gemini, Claude, Codex, and OpenCode. This process gathers independent cross-AI feedback to identify quality gaps and reduce manual review workload.

The best way to consolidate feedback from different AI CLIs is to aggregate their independent responses into a structured REVIEWS.md file. This file captures per-reviewer feedback, creating a unified document for integrating external perspectives into your project workflow.

Yes, you can use Gemini and Claude to independently review project phase plans. The workflow detects available AI CLIs, builds targeted prompts, and invokes each one separately to ensure diverse perspectives on your planning quality before aggregating the results.

You integrate external AI feedback by feeding the generated REVIEWS.md file directly into the gsd-plan-phase step. This routes the consolidated per-reviewer perspectives back into your planning cycle to refine and improve the current phase plan.

You need at least one supported AI CLI installed to run automated cross-AI phase plan reviews. The workflow actively detects available CLIs like Gemini, Claude, Codex, and OpenCode, then builds prompts and invokes the ones present on your system.

Using multiple AI CLIs for peer reviewing phase plans reduces individual model bias and captures diverse technical perspectives. Routing phase plans to independent reviewers scales the review process across projects and accelerates overall planning cycles.