gsd-review

Name: gsd-review
Availability: InStock
Author: dobrinz123

Invoke Gemini, Claude, Codex, and OpenCode CLIs to generate per-reviewer feedback and write REVIEWS.md.

Updated Apr 9, 2026

Search Tags:#automation #planning #review #peer-review #phase-plans #ai-clis

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/dobrinz123/claude-skills-share --skill gsd-review-dobrinz123

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: gsd-review
Source: https://github.com/dobrinz123/claude-skills-share/tree/main/skills/gsd-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/dobrinz123/claude-skills-share --skill gsd-review-dobrinz123

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Enables robust, external AI assessment of phase plans by routing them to multiple AI CLIs for independent feedback, reducing manual review workload and bias.

Core Features & Use Cases

Orchestrates peer reviews from Gemini, Claude, Codex, and OpenCode to gather diverse perspectives on phase plans.
Generates a structured REVIEWS.md with per-reviewer feedback that can be fed back into gsd-plan-phase --reviews.
Scales reviews across phases and projects, accelerating planning cycles and improving plan quality.

Quick Start

Run the gsd-review workflow against the target phase using the --phase flag and optional CLIs to collect external feedback.

Frequently Asked Questions about gsd-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I get AI peer reviews for phase plans from multiple CLIs?▼

To get AI peer reviews for phase plans, you can route planning documents to multiple external AI CLIs like Gemini, Claude, Codex, and OpenCode. This process gathers independent cross-AI feedback to identify quality gaps and reduce manual review workload.

What is the best way to consolidate feedback from different AI CLIs?▼

The best way to consolidate feedback from different AI CLIs is to aggregate their independent responses into a structured REVIEWS.md file. This file captures per-reviewer feedback, creating a unified document for integrating external perspectives into your project workflow.

Can I use Gemini and Claude to independently review my project phase plans?▼

Yes, you can use Gemini and Claude to independently review project phase plans. The workflow detects available AI CLIs, builds targeted prompts, and invokes each one separately to ensure diverse perspectives on your planning quality before aggregating the results.

How do I integrate external AI feedback into my phase planning workflow?▼

You integrate external AI feedback by feeding the generated REVIEWS.md file directly into the gsd-plan-phase step. This routes the consolidated per-reviewer perspectives back into your planning cycle to refine and improve the current phase plan.

Do I need specific AI CLIs installed to run automated cross-AI phase plan reviews?▼

You need at least one supported AI CLI installed to run automated cross-AI phase plan reviews. The workflow actively detects available CLIs like Gemini, Claude, Codex, and OpenCode, then builds prompts and invokes the ones present on your system.

Why use multiple AI CLIs for peer reviewing phase plans instead of a single model?▼

Using multiple AI CLIs for peer reviewing phase plans reduces individual model bias and captures diverse technical perspectives. Routing phase plans to independent reviewers scales the review process across projects and accelerates overall planning cycles.