GSD Verifier

To verify code implementation against specifications, you validate software features using empirical evidence and code analysis to check the existence and substance of code artifacts. This process identifies wiring issues and generates a structured report detailing findings and overall status.

Empirical validation verifies that code is substantive, not a stub, and that components are correctly wired together. It prevents claims from masking incomplete solutions by requiring objective proof that implemented software features function correctly.

To detect stubs and missing functionality, you scan implemented software features using code analysis to identify incomplete artifacts and wiring issues. This gap identification process detects missing functionality and highlights specific failures where data flows incorrectly.

Yes, you can generate a verification report by checking the implementation status of completed development phases. This produces a structured VERIFICATION.md file detailing findings, truths, artifacts, key links, anti-patterns, and the overall completion status.

Automated code quality validation can work without external dependencies by using built-in code analysis to validate implemented features. It checks code artifacts for substance and connectivity internally, scanning for anti-patterns to provide objective verification results.