gstack-autoplan

Run CEO, design, engineering, and DX review skills sequentially on a plan.

Updated May 19, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/anilveersingh1308/copilot-skills --skill gstack-autoplan-anilveersingh1308
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: gstack-autoplan
Source: https://github.com/anilveersingh1308/copilot-skills/tree/main/.github/skills/gstack-autoplan
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/anilveersingh1308/copilot-skills --skill gstack-autoplan-anilveersingh1308

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

gstack-autoplan removes the need to manually run a long, multi-stage review sequence by triggering a full auto-review pipeline that reads the plan and related review skills from disk, then makes consistent decisions until a final approval gate.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • One-command full review pipeline: Runs the CEO, design, engineering, and DX review skills sequentially and produces a single, fully reviewed outcome.
  • Taste and conflict handling: Surfaces “borderline scope” and “codex disagreement” style decisions, then resolves them at a final approval gate.
  • Proactive workflow support: Detects when you have a plan file and helps by offering to run the full review gauntlet without asking you to answer 15-30 intermediate questions.

Quick Start

Ask your AI to run a full auto review by saying: "Run autoplan for my plan file and make the decisions for me."

Frequently Asked Questions about gstack-autoplan

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate a multi-stage engineering plan review process?

Yes, you can auto-review a plan file by triggering a sequential pipeline that reads CEO, design, engineering, and DX review skills from disk, running them automatically to produce a single fully reviewed outcome.

How does automated plan validation handle borderline scope and decision conflicts?

Automated plan validation surfaces borderline scope and codex disagreement decisions during the sequential review, resolving them at a final approval gate that consolidates taste and decision conflicts.

What is the best way to finalize a development plan without answering intermediate review questions?

Yes, auto review supports plan-mode safe operations and uses controlled interactive gating via AskUserQuestion, applying deterministic tool usage to evaluate and finalize plans safely.

What are the limitations of auto-reviewing a plan file sequentially?

A limitation of sequential auto-review is that while it minimizes back-and-forth, it still requires a final approval gate to consolidate taste and decision conflicts before the plan is fully finalized.