gstack-openclaw-investigate

Enforce root cause investigation before applying code fixes in debugging workflows.

3|14|Updated Mar 10, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/cegit27/moodle-proctor --skill gstack-openclaw-investigate-cegit27
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: gstack-openclaw-investigate
Source: https://github.com/cegit27/moodle-proctor/tree/main/.claude/skills/gstack/openclaw/skills/gstack-openclaw-investigate
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/cegit27/moodle-proctor --skill gstack-openclaw-investigate-cegit27

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill eliminates the common pitfall of "whack-a-mole" debugging where temporary symptom fixes lead to recurring bugs and escalating technical debt by enforcing mandatory root cause investigation before any code changes are made.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured 4-Phase Workflow: Guides users through root cause investigation, pattern analysis, hypothesis testing, and verified implementation to ensure fixes address underlying issues.
  • Built-in Guardrails: Enforces the "no fixes without root cause" iron law, a 3-strike rule for failed hypotheses, and mandatory regression test creation to prevent incomplete fixes.
  • Use Case: When a user reports an intermittent 500 error on the exam submission endpoint, use this Skill to trace the code path, identify if it is a race condition or configuration drift, verify the root cause with testing, and apply a minimal fix with a regression test to prevent recurrence.

Quick Start

Use the gstack-openclaw-investigate skill to trace the root cause of the stack trace error reported when loading the teacher dashboard.

Frequently Asked Questions about gstack-openclaw-investigate

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I stop recurring bugs from temporary symptom fixes in my codebase?

Systematic root cause debugging enforces mandatory investigation before applying any code fixes to eliminate recurring whack-a-mole bug patterns. It guides you through a structured 4-phase workflow to ensure fixes address underlying issues rather than surface symptoms.

What is the best way to trace the root cause of a stack trace error?

Tracing the root cause of a stack trace error requires a structured workflow of hypothesis verification, common bug pattern matching, and full test suite validation. This approach ensures you verify the root cause with testing before applying a minimal fix.

How do I debug intermittent 500 errors on backend endpoints without causing regressions?

Debugging intermittent 500 errors requires tracing the code path to identify race conditions or configuration drift, verifying the root cause with testing, and applying a minimal fix with a mandatory regression test to prevent recurrence.

Does systematic root cause debugging work for AI service codebases and regression testing?

Systematic root cause debugging applies to all software debugging scenarios including regression root cause tracing across web, backend, and AI service codebases. It enforces a 3-strike rule for failed hypotheses and mandates regression test creation.

When should I not use symptom-based bug fixing during software engineering?

You should avoid symptom-based bug fixing whenever you face unexpected behavior or need error resolution, as it leads to escalating technical debt. Instead, enforce the no fixes without root cause iron law to permanently eliminate recurring bugs.

How do I verify a debugging hypothesis before applying code changes?

To verify a debugging hypothesis before applying code changes, you must test it against common bug patterns and validate it with a full test suite. This structured investigation enforces a 3-strike rule for failed hypotheses to prevent incomplete fixes.