gstack-openclaw-investigate

Diagnose software bugs through a phase-driven debugging workflow and produce debug reports.

1|Updated Mar 19, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/devs6186/claude-private-skills-agents-commands --skill gstack-openclaw-investigate-devs6186
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: gstack-openclaw-investigate
Source: https://github.com/devs6186/claude-private-skills-agents-commands/tree/main/skills/gstack/openclaw/skills/gstack-openclaw-investigate
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/devs6186/claude-private-skills-agents-commands --skill gstack-openclaw-investigate-devs6186

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Enables systematic debugging, root-cause analysis, and verifiable fixes for errors, stack traces, and unexpected software behavior.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured root-cause investigation: guides users through symptom collection, code tracing, and changelog review to identify root causes.
  • Pattern and hypothesis testing: analyzes failures for common patterns (race conditions, nil/null, memory issues) and supports controlled hypothesis testing.
  • Verification & reporting: produces a structured debug report with symptom, root cause, fix, evidence, regression tests, and status.

Quick Start

Begin a debugging session by outlining the observed symptom, then follow Phase 1 steps to gather context and form a root-cause hypothesis.

Frequently Asked Questions about gstack-openclaw-investigate

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I systematically root-cause software bugs from a stack trace?

To systematically root-cause software bugs from a stack trace, follow a structured debugging workflow that gathers context, analyzes failure patterns, tests hypotheses, and validates fixes with regression tests.

What is the best way to debug intermittent software failures and race conditions?

Debugging intermittent software failures and race conditions involves analyzing failures for common patterns and using controlled hypothesis testing to reproduce and verify the specific timing issue.

How do I verify that a software bug fix actually resolves the original error?

To verify a software bug fix resolves the original error, validate the fix by reproducing the issue, confirming the behavior change, and generating a structured debug report with evidence and regression tests.

Can I use a phase-driven debugging workflow for unexpected software behavior?

Yes, a phase-driven debugging workflow can be applied to unexpected software behavior by collecting symptoms, tracing code, reviewing changelogs, and forming a root-cause hypothesis before testing.

What should be included in a structured debug report for root-cause analysis?

A structured debug report for root-cause analysis should include the observed symptom, identified root cause, applied fix, supporting evidence, regression tests, and the current verification status.