gstack-openclaw-investigate

Diagnose bugs by performing root-cause analysis before applying fixes.

Updated Apr 4, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/kunalrawat425/conductor-playground --skill gstack-openclaw-investigate-kunalrawat425
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: gstack-openclaw-investigate
Source: https://github.com/kunalrawat425/conductor-playground/tree/main/.claude/skills/gstack/openclaw/skills/gstack-openclaw-investigate
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/kunalrawat425/conductor-playground --skill gstack-openclaw-investigate-kunalrawat425

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Debugging complex software often centers on symptoms. This skill provides a disciplined, root-cause-first approach to identify true issues, reducing churn and repeated fixes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Phase-driven investigation: Phase 1 Root Cause Investigation, Phase 2 Pattern Analysis, Phase 3 Hypothesis Testing, Phase 4 Implementation, Phase 5 Verification & Report.
  • Structured evidence gathering: Collect symptoms, logs, stack traces, and reproduction steps to inform hypotheses.
  • Reproducible fixes: Validate root cause with deterministic reproduction and regression tests, minimizing rework.

Quick Start

Follow Phase 1 steps to collect symptoms, read the code path, and confirm the root cause before proposing a fix.

Frequently Asked Questions about gstack-openclaw-investigate

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I find the root cause of a bug instead of just fixing the symptoms?

To find the root cause of a bug, perform structured root-cause analysis by gathering evidence like stack traces and logs, confirming reproduction steps, and validating hypotheses before applying fixes.

What is the best way to investigate intermittent failures across different codebases?

The best way to investigate intermittent failures is using a phase-driven approach that collects symptoms, analyzes patterns, and tests hypotheses to verify the root cause and prevent regressions.

How do I systematically diagnose deterministic software failures from error reports?

Systematically diagnose deterministic failures by reading the code path, gathering error reports, and verifying the root cause with deterministic reproduction and regression tests.

Does root-cause bug investigation require clear reproduction steps before proposing a fix?

Yes, root-cause bug investigation requires clear reproduction steps and structured verification to validate the true root cause and minimize repeated fixes or churn.

Why should I use hypothesis testing during software debugging?

Hypothesis testing during software debugging ensures you validate the root cause with structured evidence gathering, preventing symptom-only fixes and reducing rework.

When should I not use a root-cause-first approach for code review and bug investigation?

Avoid a root-cause-first approach when you lack sufficient evidence, logs, or reproducibility, as hypothesis testing requires clear data to validate the true issue and prevent regressions.