gstack-plan-design-review

Score design plans across UI/UX, architecture, and product roadmap dimensions.

1|1|Updated Mar 5, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/tan-yong-sheng/GrowChat --skill gstack-plan-design-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: gstack-plan-design-review
Source: https://github.com/tan-yong-sheng/GrowChat/tree/main/.claude/skills/gstack-plan-design-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/tan-yong-sheng/GrowChat --skill gstack-plan-design-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Helps teams quickly review design plans for UI/UX, architecture, and integration gaps by providing structured critiques and concrete fixes that accelerate shipping.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Interactive plan design review that scores each design dimension on a 0-10 scale and explains what would move a score to 10.
  • Operates in plan mode with actionable fixes and guardrails to avoid risky implementations.
  • Proactively suggests design improvements and aligns with product goals, including support for live-site audits via related workflows.

Quick Start

Ask me to review the current design plan and I will score dimensions, explain what would reach a 10, and propose concrete fixes.

Frequently Asked Questions about gstack-plan-design-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a design plan before implementation to ensure it is ship-ready?

A design plan critique evaluates UI/UX, architecture, and product roadmap dimensions on a 0-10 scale to identify gaps and provide concrete fixes. It ensures plans are ship-ready by offering actionable improvements and guardrails to avoid risky implementations before development starts.

How does the scoring model work for a UI and architecture design critique?

The scoring model evaluates each design dimension on a 0-10 scale and explicitly explains what specific changes are required to move the score to a 10. This interactive process operates in plan mode to proactively suggest design improvements and maintain architectural guardrails.

Can I audit a live site and integrate the findings into my product roadmap review?

Yes, you can support live-site audits via related workflows to align findings with product goals. The critique process proactively suggests design improvements and evaluates architecture and UI/UX dimensions to guide teams on what to improve before implementation.

What is the best way to find UI/UX and architecture gaps in a product design plan?

The best way to find integration gaps is to use a structured critique that scores UI/UX, architecture, and product roadmap dimensions on a 0-10 scale. This approach provides concrete fixes and actionable guidance to raise overall plan quality before shipping.

Are there limitations to using a structured scoring model for plan design reviews?

A limitation of using a structured scoring model is that it requires a structured input to function effectively. It operates specifically in plan mode to provide actionable fixes and guardrails, meaning it may not apply to unstructured or fully implemented code reviews.