gtgt(グツグツ)

Analyze plans to surface assumptions, risks, and actionable improvements.

Updated Mar 19, 2013
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/kawaken/dotfiles --skill gtgt
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: gtgt(グツグツ)
Source: https://github.com/kawaken/dotfiles/tree/main/claude/skills/gtgt
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/kawaken/dotfiles --skill gtgt

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps teams rigorously vet plans by simulating a Devil's Advocate to surface assumptions, risks, and gaps early in the planning process.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Phase 1: Devil's Advocate analysis to identify dangerous premises and worst-case scenarios.
  • Phase 2: Systematic analysis that evaluates technical feasibility and requirement coverage.
  • Phase 3: Checklist-style summary to guide decision-making and required refinements.
  • Iterative refinement with clear actionable feedback and traceable decision points for stakeholders.

Quick Start

Provide your plan and have gtgt perform a Devil's Advocate review followed by a structured analysis to validate and tighten the plan.

Frequently Asked Questions about gtgt(グツグツ)

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I identify hidden assumptions and risks in a project plan?

You can surface hidden assumptions by applying a Devil's Advocate analysis to your project plan, which systematically identifies dangerous premises and evaluates worst-case scenarios before execution.

What is the best way to validate technical feasibility and requirement coverage?

Validating technical feasibility and requirement coverage involves applying a systematic two-phase analysis that evaluates technical constraints, edge cases, and stakeholder impacts against existing development workflows.

How do I challenge a project plan to ensure it covers edge cases and dependencies?

Challenging a project plan to ensure coverage of edge cases and dependencies requires applying a Devil's Advocate review followed by structured analysis to surface gaps and tighten requirement validation.

Can I use Devil's Advocate analysis to improve stakeholder communication for decision-making?

Yes, Devil's Advocate analysis improves stakeholder communication by generating a checklist-style summary that provides actionable feedback and traceable decision points for plan refinements.

Does rigorous plan vetting work without disrupting existing development workflows?

Rigorous plan vetting works without disrupting existing development workflows by ensuring guardrails, error handling, and decision-ready outputs align with your current project goals and processes.