What problem does it solve? Reviewing pull requests against internal data governance rules, SIAN platform patterns, and operational risk criteria is inconsistent when done manually, and violations like direct data corrections in Silver/Gold layers can slip into production. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Five review lenses: Checks data correction policy violations, SIAN DAG factory patterns and naming conventions, governance (hardcoded credentials, Airflow Variables), operational risks (rollback plans, destructive changes), and general code quality. - Structured verdicts: Issues approve, approve-with-caveats, or refuse verdicts with blocker/attention/observation findings, and persists the report to .gtsi/reviews/<author>/ with automatic author detection from git config. - Use Case: Before merging a PR that adds a new Airflow DAG, ask for a review; the skill fetches the diff via gh pr view or git diff, flags a missing cluster_by for an Iceberg table and a typo in a log message, and returns an approve-with-caveats verdict. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to review PR #42 or the current branch diff before merge and give a verdict.