guard-rsi-score

Evaluate fak guard RSI loop maturity against journal-grounded KPIs.

30|12|Updated Jun 21, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/anthony-chaudhary/fak --skill guard-rsi-score
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: guard-rsi-score
Source: https://github.com/anthony-chaudhary/fak/tree/main/.claude/skills/guard-rsi-score
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/anthony-chaudhary/fak --skill guard-rsi-score

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill addresses the issue of RSI loops running in plan-mode without ever closing on real-world usage, ensuring that the guard's learning mechanism is grounded in actual decision journals rather than fabricated latency baselines.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Maturity Scoring: Evaluates the RSI loop against hard KPIs like journal-grounded logic, deterministic metrics, and non-forgeable honesty gates.
  • Realized Value Assessment: Grades the loop on its ability to process real adjudicated rows from the fak guard decision journal.
  • Debt Retirement: Provides a structured path to retire guard_rsi_debt by implementing required affordances like paired honesty tests and control-pane registration.

Quick Start

Run the guard-rsi-score skill to evaluate the current RSI loop maturity and identify the highest priority debt to retire.

Frequently Asked Questions about guard-rsi-score

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I score RSI loop maturity against KPIs?

RSI loop maturity scoring evaluates decision journal data against established KPIs by enforcing deterministic metrics and journal-grounded honesty gates. This verifies that the loop's learning mechanism is based on actual adjudicated rows rather than fabricated latency baselines.

What is the best way to transition RSI loops from plan-mode to real-world usage?

Transitioning RSI loops from plan-mode simulation requires enforcing deterministic metrics and processing real adjudicated rows from the fak guard decision journal. This structured refinement path facilitates loop closure using non-forgeable honesty gates.

How do I retire guard RSI debt using decision journals?

Retire guard RSI debt by implementing required affordances like paired honesty tests and control-pane registration. This provides a structured path to evaluate the loop's realized value and close the simulation gap.

Do I need a control-pane integration to evaluate RSI scorecards?

Yes, evaluating RSI scorecards requires integration with the fak guard control-pane and adherence to the scorecard doctrine. This ensures the evaluation relies on actual decision journals rather than fabricated baselines for loop closure.

Why does my RSI loop stay in plan-mode without closing?

Your RSI loop stays in plan-mode because it lacks journal-grounded honesty gates and deterministic metrics. Without evaluating actual fak guard decision journal data against KPIs, the loop cannot transition to real-world usage.