guild-loop-plan-review

An adversarial plan-review loop orchestrates a structured dialogue between an architect and security expert to surface plan-defect questions. It identifies security holes, scope creep, and policy gaps before user approval, generating audit-ready artifacts for traceability.

To review a plan for contract drift, trigger an adversarial review loop after plan creation. The architect and security roles conduct rounds of dialogue until a sentinel termination emits NO MORE QUESTIONS, ensuring all defect signals are resolved.

You need an automated gate approval audit trail when escalating to gate 3 planning. It preserves a complete audit trail for compliance and post-mortem analysis by generating structured handoffs, a final status, and post-sentinel artifacts.

Yes, you can dismiss plan-defect questions during the review loop. The process requires recording rationales for any dismissals to maintain traceability and ensure governance standards are met before gate 3 approval.

Yes, the plan-review loop runs without external dependencies. It orchestrates the fixed-cap dialogue internally, making it suitable for environments where minimizing external tool reliance is required for security auditing.

The limitation of a fixed-cap adversarial review loop is that dialogue rounds are capped. If the cap is reached before the NO MORE QUESTIONS sentinel is emitted, unresolved security holes or policy gaps may require manual escalation.