guilford-engine

Generate divergent ideas using Guilford's five-dimension framework across domains.

Updated Mar 26, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/d4vidc4rson/paralogy-divergent-thinking-tools --skill guilford-engine
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: guilford-engine
Source: https://github.com/d4vidc4rson/paralogy-divergent-thinking-tools/tree/main/skills/guilford-engine
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/d4vidc4rson/paralogy-divergent-thinking-tools --skill guilford-engine

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a structured protocol to generate genuinely divergent ideas using Guilford's five-dimension framework, solving the problem of convergent output and limited variety in ideation across domains.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Five-pass protocol (Fluency, Flexibility, Originality, Feasibility, Clarity) that decouples idea generation from evaluation.
  • Domain-agnostic applicability to strategy, engineering, science, design, education, policy, and research for multiple distinct options.
  • Delivers a compact, labeled portfolio of ideas with problem statements and feasibility cues to guide decision-making.

Quick Start

Provide 8-12 genuinely divergent ideas by identifying distinct sub-problems and executing Guilford Engine's five passes.

Frequently Asked Questions about guilford-engine

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate genuinely divergent ideas instead of converging on similar concepts?

Divergent ideation requires decoupling generation from evaluation. Applying Guilford's five-dimension framework across sequential passes ensures structural variety, producing a compact portfolio of distinct options with feasibility cues instead of redundant suggestions.

What is the best way to structure brainstorming across strategy, engineering, and policy domains?

A domain-agnostic protocol works best for cross-domain brainstorming. Executing five sequential passes—Fluency, Flexibility, Originality, Feasibility, and Clarity—yields labeled ideas with problem statements that apply uniformly from engineering to policy.

Can I use a structured ideation protocol for complex scientific or legal problem-solving?

Yes, structured ideation protocols suit complex scientific and legal problem-solving. The framework applies domain-agnostically to generate multiple distinct options by identifying sub-problems and evaluating originality and feasibility across iterations.

How do I evaluate originality and feasibility without limiting early brainstorming output?

Decouple idea generation from evaluation by running sequential passes. Generate options first through fluency and flexibility passes, then apply internal evaluation on originality and feasibility in later passes to yield a refined final set.

Why does my ideation process keep producing similar variations of the same concept?

Convergent output happens when evaluation occurs too early. A structured five-pass protocol forces flexibility and originality passes before feasibility evaluation, breaking patterned thinking to deliver genuinely divergent alternatives.