gutachtenstil-checker

To check Gutachtenstil compliance, submit your legal draft for a systematic four-step review of Obersatz, Definition, Subsumtion, and Ergebnis. The analysis pinpoints omitted reasoning stages, cites problematic passages, and suggests direct rewrites to correct structural errors.

Gutachtenstil requires the strict sequence of Obersatz, Definition, Subsumtion, and Ergebnis, whereas Urteilsstil often reverses this order. The checker detects when learners mix these styles or omit crucial reasoning stages, providing feedback to frame corrections as learning opportunities.

Yes, you can get rewrite suggestions for missing Subsumtion. When the evaluation detects an omitted reasoning stage, it quotes the problematic passage, identifies the missing schema step, and proposes suitable formulations to model the correct structure.

Yes, the legal feedback tool works for revising Hausarbeiten and Klausuren. It provides individual hints and overhauled sections as templates for law students and Referendare who are restructuring their case analyses to ensure correct Gutachtenstil.

Your Obersatz fails the structural check when it is out of sequence or missing required argumentative links. The evaluation systematically traces the schema stages, quotes the flawed text, and explains how to rephrase it to restore proper Gutachtenstil compliance.