hackify

Orchestrate end-to-end software development workflows with a single tracked work document.

3|Updated May 11, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/nadyshalaby/hackify --skill hackify
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: hackify
Source: https://github.com/nadyshalaby/hackify/tree/main/skills/hackify
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/nadyshalaby/hackify --skill hackify

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill replaces scattered planning, implementation, verification, and review steps with one disciplined workflow for substantive development tasks. It keeps work in a single per-task markdown doc so progress can pause, resume, and stay auditable across sessions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Unified task flow: Handles features, fixes, refactors, redesigns, debugging, migrations, and research-then-build work through one end-to-end process.
  • Single work-doc source of truth: Tracks clarifying questions, plan, backlog, daily updates, verification proof, and retrospective notes in one file under docs/work/.
  • Strong delivery guardrails: Enforces upfront clarification, a plan approval gate, evidence-based verification, parallel review, and a definition of done before saying the work is complete.
  • Useful examples: Great for backend feature work, frontend redesigns, multi-step bug fixes, design system changes, and any task that needs careful review and reproducible proof.

Quick Start

Use the hackify skill to turn this task into a work-doc, clarify the scope, and guide the change from plan through verified completion.

Frequently Asked Questions about hackify

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I manage a complex software development workflow in a single document?

A software development workflow can be managed in a single markdown document by tracking clarifying questions, plans, backlogs, daily updates, and verification proof together. This approach keeps substantive tasks auditable and allows progress to pause and resume across sessions.

What is the best way to track bug fixes and refactoring with reproducible verification?

Tracking bug fixes and refactoring with reproducible verification requires a workflow that enforces evidence-based testing and a strict definition of done. You can use a single work-doc to capture the plan, implementation, and proof before claiming completion.

How do I structure an end-to-end development task from planning to review?

An end-to-end development task is structured by moving through clarification, plan approval, implementation, evidence-based verification, parallel review, and finish. This process applies to feature work, migrations, and redesigns, ensuring strict gates are met before completion.

Can I handle frontend redesigns and multi-step migrations using one tracked process?

Frontend redesigns and multi-step migrations can be handled using one unified task flow. This process accommodates research-then-build scenarios and design system changes by requiring upfront clarification and tracking all progress in a single source of truth.

When do I need a strict workflow with delivery guardrails for software engineering?

You need a strict workflow with delivery guardrails for substantive software engineering tasks that require careful review and reproducible proof. This ensures a plan approval gate, parallel review, and a definition of done are met before completion is claimed.

Why does my development workflow need a plan approval gate before implementation?

A development workflow needs a plan approval gate before implementation to enforce upfront clarification and scope alignment. This guardrail prevents scattered planning by requiring a reviewed plan in the work-doc before any code changes proceed.