hara-orchestrator

Orchestrate Stage0–Stage4 HARA workflows with isolated sub-agents and validation gates.

2|Updated May 13, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/WSJ40/hara-mutiagent --skill hara-orchestrator
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: hara-orchestrator
Source: https://github.com/WSJ40/hara-mutiagent/tree/main/skills/hara-orchestrator
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/WSJ40/hara-mutiagent --skill hara-orchestrator

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

It solves the complexity of running a full end-to-end HARA workflow consistently across multiple stages, while enforcing validation gates and producing the final JSON/Excel deliverables.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • End-to-end HARA orchestration: Coordinates Stage0 through Stage4, including per-Function and per-MF execution boundaries.
  • Quality gates & recovery: Runs deterministic checks between stages (e.g., stage JSON validation) and supports rerunning specific failed stages without redoing everything.
  • Strict multi-agent isolation: Ensures each stage/review work runs in properly isolated sub-agents and communicates only via JSON artifacts.

Quick Start

Run hara-orchestrator to parse your source documents and automatically generate gated Stage0–Stage4 HARA outputs in output/<RUN_ID>.json and output/<RUN_ID>.xlsx.

Frequently Asked Questions about hara-orchestrator

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate end-to-end HARA generation across multiple stages with validation gates?

End-to-end HARA generation is automated by dispatching isolated per-Function and per-MF sub-agent work across Stage0 through Stage4, running deterministic validation checks between stages to ensure safety analysis consistency before final export.

Can I rerun specific failed stages in a multi-agent safety analysis workflow without redoing everything?

Yes, specific failed stages in the multi-agent safety analysis workflow can be rerun individually because the orchestrator runs deterministic validation gates between stages and supports recovery without executing the entire pipeline from scratch.

How do multi-agent orchestration workflows enforce JSON-only communication for HARA scenario generation?

Multi-agent orchestration workflows enforce JSON-only communication by ensuring each stage and review process runs in properly isolated sub-agents that exchange artifacts exclusively through validated JSON schemas, satisfying strict inter-agent communication requirements.

Does this HARA orchestration workflow export results to both JSON and Excel formats?

Yes, the HARA orchestration workflow exports final deliverables to both JSON and Excel formats, generating structured output files in your designated output directory after Stage4 SG_Sum derivation and SEC evaluation are complete.

What is the best way to handle Stage3A and Stage3B scenario generation in an automated safety analysis pipeline?

The best way to handle Stage3A and Stage3B scenario generation is using a gated orchestration pipeline that dispatches isolated sub-agent work for SEC evaluation, followed by Stage4 SG_Sum derivation with stop-on-validation-error behavior.

Why does multi-agent workflow automation require stage-specific schema routing for safety analysis?

Multi-agent workflow automation requires stage-specific schema routing to ensure deterministic validation gates can accurately verify JSON artifacts between Stage0 and Stage4, preventing invalid safety analysis data from propagating downstream.