hara-stage3br

Validate Stage 3B SEC ratings, FTTI consistency, and safety goal coverage.

2|Updated May 13, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/WSJ40/hara-mutiagent --skill hara-stage3br
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: hara-stage3br
Source: https://github.com/WSJ40/hara-mutiagent/tree/main/skills/hara-stage3br
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/WSJ40/hara-mutiagent --skill hara-stage3br

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

hara-stage3br helps you review Stage 3B SEC semantics, FTTI, and the resulting safety goal/state for each matched output so that only meaningful Stage 3B issues are surfaced without re-evaluating Stage 3A scenario quality.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • SEC semantic review for Stage 3B: Checks S/E/C ratings, sec_reasoning support, and whether the review aligns with the underlying scenario facts.
  • FTTI alignment verification: Verifies that FTTI is consistent with hazard development time and available reaction time requirements.
  • Safety goal & safe state coverage: Ensures safety_goal covers the highest credible risk path and safe_state can achieve it.
  • Batch-based, worker-parallel workflow: Reviews up to 5 scenario+SEC pairings per batch and merges results into a single review artifact for traceability.
  • Guided correction loop: If S/E/C is wrong, reruns the relevant Stage 3B dimension batch first, then re-merges and re-validates with the stage3b gate.

Quick Start

Run the Stage3B JSON validation and then prepare stage3b-review-batches context to review outputs in batches using the provided checks and prompts.

Frequently Asked Questions about hara-stage3br

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I validate S/E/C ratings and FTTI consistency for Stage 3B safety outputs?

To validate S/E/C ratings and FTTI consistency, review Stage 3B SEC semantics by checking sec_reasoning support and verifying FTTI alignment with hazard development time for each matched scenario-output record.

What is the best way to review safety goal and safe state coverage in a hazard analysis?

Reviewing safety goal and safe state coverage ensures the safety_goal addresses the highest credible risk path and the safe_state can achieve it, validating Stage 3B SEC semantics without re-evaluating Stage 3A scenario quality.

How do I run batch evaluations for Stage 3B risk assessments in parallel?

Run batch evaluations by processing up to 5 scenario and SEC pairings per batch, merging results into a single review artifact for traceability and per-MF batch worker evaluations.

What steps are needed to correct wrong S/E/C ratings during a Stage 3B risk assessment?

To correct wrong S/E/C ratings, rerun the relevant Stage 3B dimension batch first, then re-merge and re-validate the outputs using the stage3b gate to satisfy deterministic stage gating requirements.

Does the Stage 3B review process re-rate Stage 3A scenario quality?

No, the Stage 3B review process does not re-rate Stage 3A scenario quality; it strictly validates Stage 3B SEC semantics, FTTI consistency, and safety goal coverage for matched outputs.

How do I satisfy deterministic stage gating requirements for Stage 3B JSON validation?

Satisfy deterministic stage gating requirements by running check_stage_json.py with the --stage stage3b command to validate records and generate the output review JSON file without re-rating Stage 3A.