harness-evaluator

To audit a software workflow and decide go or no-go, provide your task details to an evaluator that reads the context, checks security, functionality, tests, performance, and principles, then classifies findings as P0, P1, or P2 to return a clear decision.

P0, P1, and P2 severity classification in post-implementation auditing categorizes discovered issues by criticality to determine if a workflow passes or fails, directly driving the final go/no-go verdict based on the highest severity finding.

Evaluating task functionality and security before release requires following ordered audit steps: run security checks first, verify functionality and tests next, assess performance, and review principles to classify issues and output a go/no-go decision.

Yes, you can use a structured evaluator workflow for software-quality checks without manual review by assigning the auditor role to an automated evaluator that ingests task context and applies disciplined sequential checks to output a verdict.

You need a go-no-go decision process for your software development workflow when you require standardized post-implementation auditing to enforce strict quality gates, ensuring security, functionality, performance, and principles are verified before release.