skills.rest
huangbaixun
huangbaixunCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

harness:receiving-code-review

Verify code-review feedback for technical correctness and constraint compliance before implementation.

3|1|Updated Apr 5, 2026
Search Tags:#code review#implementation planning#verification#clarification#ADR#features.json#regression safety
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/huangbaixun/harness-engineering --skill harness-receiving-code-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: harness:receiving-code-review
Source: https://github.com/huangbaixun/harness-engineering/tree/main/skills/receiving-code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/huangbaixun/harness-engineering --skill harness-receiving-code-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It prevents incorrect or unclear code-review suggestions from being implemented blindly by enforcing technical verification, clarification, and safe execution grounded in the codebase and project constraints.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Verification-first response flow: Restate the requested changes, confirm technical correctness against the actual repository, and only then decide whether to implement.
  • Unclear-feedback handling: Stops implementation when any review item is unclear and requests clarification before taking action.
  • Rigor for external reviewer suggestions: Checks for context fit, regression risk, platform/version compatibility, and whether the reviewer understands full codebase implications.
  • Guardrails for rigid constraints and architecture: Requires features.json reconciliation for rigid-constraint changes and mandates ADR creation/updates for architectural changes before merge.
  • Discourages performative agreement: Avoids gratitude and affirmation-only responses; focuses on concrete technical acknowledgment and verified fixes.

Quick Start

Use this skill when you receive multi-item code-review feedback that is unclear, technically questionable, or potentially risky to implement without validation.

Frequently Asked Questions about harness:receiving-code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify code review feedback before implementing changes?▼

Verify code review feedback by restating the requested changes, confirming technical correctness against the actual repository, and checking for regression risk before deciding to implement.

What should I do when code review feedback is unclear or technically questionable?▼

When code review feedback is unclear, stop implementation immediately and request clarification from the reviewer before taking any action to avoid implementing incorrect suggestions blindly.

How do I handle code review suggestions that conflict with existing architectural decisions?▼

Handle conflicting architectural suggestions by mandating ADR creation or updates before merge, ensuring the review feedback undergoes architectural verification rather than silent acceptance or rejection.

How do I ensure regression safety when implementing external reviewer suggestions?▼

Ensure regression safety with external suggestions by checking context fit, platform compatibility, version constraints, and whether the reviewer understands full codebase implications before implementing.

When do I need to reconcile rigid constraints in features.json during code review?▼

Reconcile rigid constraints in features.json when code review feedback requests changes that potentially violate rigid project constraints, requiring explicit validation before any implementation proceeds.

How do I avoid performative agreement when responding to code review comments?▼

Avoid performative agreement by skipping gratitude and affirmation-only responses, focusing instead on concrete technical acknowledgment and verified fixes grounded in the actual codebase.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
chokky-educationchokky-education

receiving-code-review

Standardizes incoming code review feedback verification and technical response preparation for pull requests and peer sessions.

Community
Intermediate
rcrespodevrcrespodev

living-docs

Generates Markdown documentation from git diffs with Obsidian-compatible YAML frontmatter.

Community
Advanced
eng-vmessiaheng-vmessiah
2

ai-regression-testing

Automate regression tests validating API response shapes and state integrity.

Community
Intermediate
jnPiyushjnPiyush

code-review-and-audit

Automate code review, security audits, and compliance verification in CI/CD pipelines.

Community
Advanced