hatch3r-migration

Plan and execute phased database, framework, and dependency migrations with rollback procedures.

26|4|Updated Feb 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/hatch3r/hatch3r --skill hatch3r-migration
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: hatch3r-migration
Source: https://github.com/hatch3r/hatch3r/tree/main/skills/hatch3r-migration
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/hatch3r/hatch3r --skill hatch3r-migration

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It helps teams plan and execute high-risk migrations without breaking consumers by analyzing breaking changes, running phased deployments, and validating rollback paths.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Breaking-change analysis for migrations: Compares current vs target surfaces for databases, frameworks, and dependencies, then documents required code changes by affected locations.
  • Phased, rollback-safe execution: Breaks work into independently deployable phases with explicit rollback steps and validation criteria between phases.
  • Verification and post-migration cleanup: Runs tests and integrity checks after each phase, benchmarks performance where relevant, and removes compatibility shims and obsolete scripts once complete.
  • Error handling guardrails: Ensures a phase failure rolls back to the last successful checkpoint and treats rollback correctness gaps and dependency conflicts as deployment risks.

Quick Start

Ask the AI to plan and execute a safe migration from the current stack to your target version using staged rollout, verification after each phase, and a tested rollback plan.

Frequently Asked Questions about hatch3r-migration

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I plan a safe database schema migration with breaking changes?

Safe database schema migrations require breaking-change analysis that compares current versus target surfaces and documents required code changes by affected locations. The process supports brownfield scenarios by segmenting deployment into independent phases with validation criteria between each stage.

What is the best way to execute phased rollouts for framework and dependency upgrades?

Phased rollouts for dependency upgrades break migration work into independently deployable phases, ensuring rollback safety through checkpointed execution. Each phase runs tests and integrity checks before proceeding, treating dependency conflicts as explicit deployment risks.

How do rollback procedures work during a failed migration phase?

Rollback procedures activate automatically when a migration phase fails, reverting the system to the last successful checkpoint. The process treats rollback correctness gaps as deployment risks and requires tested validation paths before advancing to higher-risk phases.

Can I use this migration approach for brownfield-only scenarios with consumer compatibility requirements?

Brownfield-only migrations are fully supported when consumer-compatibility handling is required. The approach analyzes breaking changes across affected locations, stages execution from low to high risk, and validates consumer impact between each deployment phase.

How do I handle post-migration cleanup after a phased rollout?

Post-migration cleanup removes compatibility shims and obsolete scripts after all phases complete successfully. The process benchmarks performance where relevant, runs final integrity checks, and generates documentation recording the completed migration state.

When should I not use a phased migration strategy?

Phased migration strategies should be avoided when rollback correctness cannot be validated or dependency conflicts remain unresolved, as these are treated as deployment risks. Any phase failure triggers automatic rollback to the previous checkpoint rather than proceeding forward.