health

Aggregate type checks, linting, tests, and dead-code detection into a weighted 0-10 health score.

Updated Apr 4, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/kunalrawat425/conductor-playground --skill health-kunalrawat425
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: health
Source: https://github.com/kunalrawat425/conductor-playground/tree/main/.claude/skills/gstack/health
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/kunalrawat425/conductor-playground --skill health-kunalrawat425

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Code health is hard to gauge across multiple tools. health wraps type checking, linter, test runner, dead code detector, and shell linter to produce a single weighted 0-10 score and track trends over time.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Integrates type checkers, linters, test runners, dead code detectors, and shell lints.
  • Computes a weighted 0-10 health score and shows trends over time.
  • Use cases: monitoring repo health, detecting regressions, prioritizing fixes via a dashboard.

Quick Start

Run a health check to generate a current health score for your project.

Frequently Asked Questions about health

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I aggregate code quality metrics into a single repository health score?

You can aggregate code quality metrics into a single health score by running type checks, linting, tests, and dead-code detection, which generates a weighted 0-10 score for your repository.

What is the best way to track code quality trends over time across multiple tools?

Tracking code quality trends over time is done by computing a weighted health score from multiple linters and test runners, then persisting these metrics per commit to visualize regressions.

Can I detect code regressions using a weighted 0-10 health score?

Yes, you can detect code regressions by monitoring the weighted 0-10 health score, which orchestrates type checks and dead-code detection to flag drops in quality across commits.

Does this code health monitoring approach work with type checkers and dead code detectors?

This code health monitoring approach works directly with type checkers, test runners, linters, and dead code detectors to compute a unified health score for your software repository.

How do I visualize code quality trends to prioritize fixes via a dashboard?

You visualize code quality trends to prioritize fixes via a dashboard by running a health check that aggregates type checking and linting results, persisting the weighted score per commit.

When do I need a unified code health score instead of individual linter outputs?

You need a unified code health score when individual linter outputs become hard to gauge, allowing you to monitor overall repo health and track regressions over time using a single metric.