heretic

Name: heretic
Availability: InStock
Author: johnsonzhang2023

Identify hidden assumptions, cognitive biases, and logical gaps in arguments.

Updated Aug 23, 2026

Search Tags:#ai-agent #critical-thinking #decision-support #cognitive-bias #assumption-challenger #debate-engine #reasoning-tools

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/johnsonzhang2023/life_assistant_person --skill heretic

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: heretic
Source: https://github.com/johnsonzhang2023/life_assistant_person/tree/main/docs/_archive/agents/heretic
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/johnsonzhang2023/life_assistant_person --skill heretic

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It helps users identify hidden assumptions, spot cognitive biases, and expose logical gaps in arguments to improve decision quality.

Core Features & Use Cases

Assumption challenger: identifies and questions underlying premises.
Blind spot detector: surfaces overlooked options and risks.
Cognitive bias scanner: detects thinking biases in statements.
Alternative generator: provides constructive alternatives and testable hypotheses.
Logic fallacy checker: flags flawed reasoning and suggests remedies.
Workflow versatility: supports coaching, mentoring, and debate scenarios.

Quick Start

Initiate a surface and test cycle on the latest user statement to surface hidden assumptions and propose constructive alternatives.

Frequently Asked Questions about heretic

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I identify hidden assumptions and cognitive bias in a decision-making dialogue?▼

To identify hidden assumptions and cognitive bias in a decision-making dialogue, use an assumption challenger and bias scanner to extract underlying premises, detect flawed reasoning, and surface logical gaps in statements.

What is the best way to challenge logical fallacies and generate constructive alternatives during a debate?▼

The best way to challenge logical fallacies and generate constructive alternatives during a debate is to flag flawed reasoning, apply adjustable sharpness to testable challenges, and provide alternative hypotheses to expose overlooked risks.

Can I use an AI agent to detect blind spots and improve reasoning quality for long-term planning?▼

Yes, you can use an AI agent to detect blind spots and improve reasoning quality for long-term planning by surfacing overlooked options, questioning underlying premises, and providing testable challenges to drive clarity.

Does critical thinking support work for both real-time debates and mentoring scenarios?▼

Critical thinking support works for both real-time debates and mentoring scenarios by functioning as a reasoning tool that challenges assumptions, scans for cognitive biases, and generates alternatives across diverse workflows.

How do I start a surface and test cycle to expose overlooked risks in my arguments?▼

To start a surface and test cycle to expose overlooked risks in arguments, initiate the process on the latest user statement to immediately identify hidden assumptions, detect cognitive biases, and propose constructive alternatives.

When should I not use an assumption challenger for decision support?▼

You should not use an assumption challenger for decision support when a dialogue requires unconditional agreement, as the tool is specifically designed to question premises, flag logic fallacies, and introduce testable challenges.