skills.rest
hujianbest
hujianbestCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

hf-code-review

Review code implementations across seven quality dimensions and deliver a verdict.

1|Updated Mar 22, 2026
Search Tags:#architecture#traceability#code-review#escalation#conformance#two-hats#CR7
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/hujianbest/garage-agent --skill hf-code-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: hf-code-review
Source: https://github.com/hujianbest/garage-agent/tree/main/packs/coding/skills/hf-code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/hujianbest/garage-agent --skill hf-code-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill formalizes after-test-review code assessments, identifying correctness gaps, design conformance issues, and architectural health to ensure sustainable software quality.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 7-dimension code review: evaluates correctness, design consistency, error handling, readability, scope guards, down-stream traceability readiness, and architectural health.
  • CR7 & Two Hats discipline: enforces proper Refactor Note practices, clear hat boundaries, and escalation handling.
  • Structured verdict & next steps: produces a single recommended action and actionable findings to feed into traceability.

Quick Start

Run the HF Code Review on the latest commit to produce findings and the next action.

Frequently Asked Questions about hf-code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform a formal code review for design consistency and error handling?▼

A formal code review evaluates design consistency and error handling by applying a 7-dimension assessment covering correctness, readability, scope guards, and traceability readiness. This process identifies conformance gaps and delivers a structured verdict with a single recommended next step.

What is a two-hats discipline in post-test-review code quality checks?▼

Two-hats discipline in code quality checks enforces clear role boundaries and proper Refactor Note practices during formal assessments. It ensures structured separation of concerns while identifying architectural health issues and correctness gaps in post-test-review implementations.

How do I identify code conformance gaps and traceability readiness after testing?▼

To identify code conformance gaps and traceability readiness after testing, apply CR7 standards to evaluate correctness and architectural health. This produces evidence-based findings and a structured verdict to feed into downstream traceability systems.

Does CR7 code review enforce escalation boundaries for architectural health?▼

Yes, CR7 code review enforces escalation boundaries for architectural health by applying two-hats discipline to formal 7-dimension reviews. It identifies correctness gaps and design conformance issues while delivering a single recommended next action.

When do I need to enforce scope guards and readability in a post-test-review?▼

You need to enforce scope guards and readability in a post-test-review when formalizing after-test assessments to ensure sustainable software quality. This identifies conformance gaps and architectural health issues through a structured 7-dimension evaluation.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
daddiadaddia
1

review-design

Review work-package design.md for implementation readiness and append a verdict.

Community
Advanced
ag-gridag-grid
1

plan-review

Analyze implementation plans for completeness, correctness, and verifiability.

Official
Advanced
unheadedunheaded
2

unheaded-marshal

Detect and enforce battle plan execution discipline across timelines and verification gates.

Official
Advanced
hung-phanhung-phan

pragmatic-programmer

Identifies software quality issues using Pragmatic Programmer heuristics.

Community
Intermediate